Dr. King further discredits the United States intentions in Vietnam by comparing us to Germany in World War II saying, What do they think as we test out our latest weapons on them, just as the Germans tested out new medicine and new tortures in the concentration camps of Europe? Overall, Martin Luther King Jr. eloquently argues against the United States involvement in Vietnam through his use of parallelism, diction, and imagery. (2016, Nov 14). In a solemn tone, he talks about their crops being destroyed and their water being poisoned, presumably referring to Agent Orange. He means to make people ask questions of themselves and ponder over the meaninglessness and uselessness of war and what would remain behind once the war was over. Apart from highlighting the wicked nature of the war, King Jr 's speech also sets the urgency for protest. By repeating the phrase, "for the sake," he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. Likewise, during this time period, America [put little effort into] rehabilitation of its poor creating an even harder life for them (Source A). In a sense, he dives right into the idea that it is unrealistic for them to find freedom in a region halfway across the world when they couldnt even find it in America. Luther was a charismatic leader who took a firm stand against the oppressive and racist regime of the United States (US), devoting much of his life towards uniting the segregated African-American community of the US. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . In Hanoi are the men who led the nation to independence against the Japanese and the French, the men who sought membership in the French Commonwealth and were betrayed by the weakness of Paris and the willfulness of the colonial armies. 2022. Furthermore the Kings parallel structure clarifies and highlights his intent by building up to a more important point. War makes the innocent lose hope and leaves behind horrific memories for generations on both sides. King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. He says, And we must rejoice as well, for surely this is the first time in our nation's history that a significant number of its religious leaders have chosen to move beyond the prophesying of smooth patriotism to the high grounds of a firm dissent based upon the mandates of conscience and the reading of history. describing the ways in which the war is detrimental to the American people, King writes that "Vietnam. The image of death, as powerful as it is, becomes amplified when Martin Luther King associates the injustices of segregation with the Vietnam war. Not only were they fighting for their own rights in 1976, but they were sending away the son, husbands, brothers of other Americans thousands of miles away to the country of Vietnam to fight an unjust war for the rights of the people in Southeast Asia. These arguments work because they point out that even though the war is not happening on our soil, it is having a devastating effect here, especially in poor areas where people cannot afford to be hindered any more than they already are. When he argues that the war's immoral nature should be "incandescently clear," he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, "the integrity and life of America.". 350 5th Ave, New York, NY 10118, USA. He believed that the Vietnam War diverted money and attention from domestic programs created to aid the black poor and would benefit only the banks who fund wars and the industries that supply the war. His choice of words in the speech is meant to have a direct effect on the audience's psychology. King Jr makes a strong statement against war and his speech successfully evokes compassion and sympathy for the poor and the weak in both Vietnam and America. He talks about the innocent people killed in the crossfire, mostly children. King spoke for the weak that did not have the voices to speak for themselves; for example, he represented the poor. This quote is referencing how poor and rich people were drafted to war but the poor people had no one left to support the family. His use of imagery and diction is aimed at making people break their silence and express their anger clearly. The third section is King's call for change. Both religion and society condemn war and even popular religious figures have stood up to speak against it for the toll it takes upon human lives and for it is against the spirit of humanity and brotherhood. It also describes the Jim Crow laws and the busboy cot from 1955. Additionally, by constructing an optimistic view on the civil rights situation during that time period and immediately refuting it, King is able to establish a strong sense of, Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential leaders of his time and played a crucial role in the African-American Civil Rights movement. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. For example, King says, We have waited for more than 340 years for our constitutional and God given rights (2). Martin Luther King notes that we have been repeatedly faced with the cruel irony of watching Negro and white boys on TV screens as they kill and die together for a nation that has been unable to seat them together in the same schools (King). match. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. For example, in paragraph 7, King discusses the harsh reality of the war. Over the past two years, as I have moved to break the betrayal of my own silences and to speak from the burnings of my own heart, as I have called for radical departures from the destruction of Vietnam, many persons have questioned me about the wisdom of my path. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. When he argues that the wars immoral nature should be incandescently clear, he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, the integrity and life of America. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . Beyond Vietnam A Time To Break Silence Analysis | ipl.org Recognizing that citizens in poverty were not able to support their families while away from home at war, Martin Luther King included that war [and being enlisted in battle was] an enemy of poor to demonstrate how even though any man could be drafted, the economically stable left behind support for their family while the impoverished were ineligible of doing so (Source A). He was in the process of proving that it wasn 't a money issue in America, but an equality issue. Kings dialect showed the audience civil right issues, involving many rhetorical strategies using ethos, logos, and pathos, to a racially tempered crowd whom he viewed as different, but not equal. Rhetorical Analysis In King's Beyond Vietnam - 751 Words | Cram A comment like this doesnt leave the reader unmoved. The war according to King Jr. is nothing more than a political game played for the sake of fun and ego. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. The speech deemed racial segregation to be an inhumane practice that subdivides society into groups that essentially alienate them from the true sense of humanity; which is brotherhood. Please enter the email address that you use to login to TeenInk.com, and we'll email you instructions to reset your password. "The Fine Art of Baloney Detection" Essay by Carl Sagan. He does not want the church leaders to simply listen to his message. 4 May. report, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther Kings Beyond Vietnam: a Time to Break Silence. Despite criticism from speaking out about things other than civil rights, King uses syntax, rhetorical strategies, and appeals to . The paper also analyzes Martin Luther Kings speech I have a dream with the purpose of rhetorical devices and how well they have been used in the speech, and how Afro-Americans conditions have been at the time. Rhetorical Analysis, Martin Luther King Rhetorical Devices Analysis, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.S Speech, A Rhetorical Analysis Journey Through Martin Luther King Jr.s SpeechI Have a Dream. In this way, he appeals to the emotions of the audience and challenges the logic behind an unnecessary war. Beyond_Vietnam_Rhetorical_Analysis_Essay.docx.docx - Thomas PDF Beyond Vietnam, speech by Dr. Martin Luther King, NYC, 4/4/67 (2022, May 4). For example, he writes vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will, drown your sisters and brothers and hated filled policemen even kill your brothers and sisters (3). The war was only going to consume lives and resources. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." Registration number: 419361 Throughout the first paragraph of Kings speech, he used emotional diction with words such as struggle, poverty, and poor to prove that the war in Vietnam was bringing down the Americans and their families fighting overseas. Thank you for sharing this page with a friend! His audience at Riverside Church, likely familiar with his Civil Rights work, would most likely than view him with more credibility because they too could sympathize to an injustice done by the American government. By repeating the phrase, "for the sake," he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. However, a very powerful speech, in manys opinion, is the Ive Been to the Mountaintop speech, given shortly before Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated. We try to make TeenInk.com the best site it can be, and we take your feedback very seriously. With an urgent tone, he repeats the phrase, we must speak (4), several times. Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King's "Beyond | Bartleby Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audiences anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. This demonstrates to the audience that he realizes it is going to be difficult for them to speak out in opposition of the government. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam In conclusion, Martin Luther King, Jr uses ethos, pathos, and logos, among other rhetorical devices, to support his argument that American policy in Vietnam was inconsistent with its treatment of African-Americans in the United States. Graduateway.com is owned and operated by Radioplus Experts Ltd It is why while he attacks America's intervention in Vietnam on the one hand, on the other he brings people's attention towards the other side of life where America can become a beacon of hope and peace for the entire world including Vietnam. By repeating the phrase, for the sake, he creates a rhythmic flow that causes his audience to be more receptive to his idea. King was really able to speak to his audience by using evidence, reasoning, and a persuasive writing style throughout his speech. 838 Words Apart from drawing a parallel between the situation in Vietnam and America, he shows neither stood to gain from it. He says, To me the relationship of this ministry to the making of peace is so obvious that I sometimes marvel at those who ask me why Im speaking against the war (12). Likewise, the image of men, both black and while, in brutal solidarity burning the huts of a poor village, helps establish the war in Vietnam as a complete disaster and atrocity. StudyCorgi. Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk's Beyond Vietnam - 419 Words | Cram He tries to make people see the other side of the picture where both black and white men were being pushed into hell without considering and questioning the outcome. Many people believed that America had no reason to interfere, Dr. King being one of those people. The irony is explicit in Kings words that the war is just an attempt to cover and hide the more pressing issues before America. He picks from history as well as politics and also supports his choices with philosophical wisdom. However, his speech is not filled entirely with only emotionally charged words and phrases or just with pictures of war and destruction or poverty. Rhetorical Analysis of MLK's Speech "Beyond Vietnam" - Teen Ink Despite having a shining moment of experiments, hopes, [and] new beginnings during the struggle for human rights, King illustrates the Vietnam War as broken and eviscerate and a political plaything of a society gone mad on war. On April 4, 1967 at Riverside Church in New York, MLK delivered "Beyond Vietnam" , which created a different perspective on the Vietnam war, in which is a negative thing. He is disappointed in te church and his disappointment is worse because he feels so strongly for the church, as is evident through his tears.

Sonya Curry Interview, Bipolar After Breakup, Bluna Facefit Kf94, Drift Restaurant Belmont, Nc, Articles B