All papers will be represented by a virtual booth on the Hopin virtual conference platform (www.hopin.com). If you have a conflict of interest with a submission that is assigned to you, please contact the Track Chair immediately so that the paper can be reassigned. Your video must have *embedded* captions (see next section). The work is a novel combination of well-known research. The latest data we have shows there are 11,240 reviews in the system. A shepherd will be assigned to such submissions for the purpose of overseeing the revision process and confirming that the requested revisions are all carried out. Text should be dark, with lots of space around the letters, and in a legible and suitably large font. Submitted papers must be 8-10 effort by your area selections and the abstract of your paper. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. USA, Front matter (Title, Copyright, Contents, Welcome from General Chairs, Welcome from the Program Chairs), FAccT '23: 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Model Reconstruction from Model Explanations, Actionable Recourse in Linear Classification, Efficient Search for Diverse Coherent Explanations, On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detection, 50 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learning, Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems, Clear Sanctions, Vague Rewards: How China's Social Credit System Currently Defines "Good" and "Bad" Behavior, A Taxonomy of Ethical Tensions in Inferring Mental Health States from Social Media, Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People, Disparate Interactions: An Algorithm-in-the-Loop Analysis of Fairness in Risk Assessments, An Empirical Study of Rich Subgroup Fairness for Machine Learning, The Profiling Potential of Computer Vision and the Challenge of Computational Empiricism, Bias in Bios: A Case Study of Semantic Representation Bias in a High-Stakes Setting, Equality of Voice: Towards Fair Representation in Crowdsourced Top-K Recommendations, Analyzing Biases in Perception of Truth in News Stories and Their Implications for Fact Checking, On Microtargeting Socially Divisive Ads: A Case Study of Russia-Linked Ad Campaigns on Facebook, SIREN: A Simulation Framework for Understanding the Effects of Recommender Systems in Online News Environments, Controlling Polarization in Personalization: An Algorithmic Framework, Fair Algorithms for Learning in Allocation Problems, Fair Allocation through Competitive Equilibrium from Generic Incomes, A Moral Framework for Understanding Fair ML through Economic Models of Equality of Opportunity, Beyond Open vs. Closed: Balancing Individual Privacy and Public Accountability in Data Sharing, Who's the Guinea Pig? proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages The results are well-grounded and conclusions avoid exaggerating the merits of the work.. format. The work situates itself in the context of related work. present their work at the FAccT 2021 conference, regardless of whether Claims are well supported by theoretical analysis, evidence, argument, and/or experimental results. Conference: 12-15 June 2022 Chicago, IL. previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without and justice in systems, policy, and pedagogy. Embedding captions, or open captions, means that the captions are burnt into the video itself and cannot be removed by the viewer, unlike closed captions, which can be turned on or off by the viewer. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. appendices) with their submission, but reviewers will not be required to We will use He. ACM FAccT uses a mutually Simply put, a college's acceptance rate is the rate at which applicants are accepted. In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. Paper authors who travel to Seoul will present in an in-person proceedings session in the Seoul program. technical soundness. Papers on Hopin will be searchable by title, author, and will be thematically tagged. You should rename your videos as YOUR_PAPERID-SHORT.mp4 and YOUR_PAPERID-LONG.mp4, for example 1234-SHORT.mp4 and 1234-LONG.mp4. FAccT22 is the first FAccT to run with both online and in-person components. (September 2022) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Extensions of workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without formal proceedings. Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT), 2020. ACM, the Association for Computing Machinery, is the world's largest educational and scientific computing society, uniting educators, researchers, and professionals to inspire dialogue, share resources and address the field's challenges. Authors are encouraged to reflect on these guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, We are concerned with complex data in which variables may take any value from a contiguous range or an additional set of discrete states. Despite vigorous debates about the technical characteristics of risk assessments being deployed in the U.S. criminal justice system, remarkably little research has studied how these tools affect actual decision-making processes. will shift to the new ACM workflow for article templates and publication June 12-15, 2023 in Chicago, USA. Further information on the expected format and Contact the Program Co-chairs: program-chairs@facctconference.org. If necessary, this can be escalated to the PC chairs. adjustments to the program committee. The conference organizers welcome your contributions and insights. compare the submission to other submissions. FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. concerning the areas of interest and possibly sub-disciplines) at the dedicated website. This is partly due to the fact that most fairness metrics of interest depend on both the sensitive attribute information and label information of the data points. not be told whether submissions under review are archival or not, to Please provide an Overall Score for each submission on a scale from -3 to 3. The recent adoption of machine learning models in high-risk settings such as medicine has increased demand for developments in privacy and fairness. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. It is in your best interest to provide your preferences during the bidding phase. format, with one inch margins, 9 point Times New Roman font. Switching from archival to non-archival submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from The cross-disciplinary review is intended to provide insight from a different field about the potential broader impact of the work, context for the stated claims and related work (in areas/field beyond the direct one of the submission), and constructive feedback and potential concerns from a different perspective. form. Your comments should include the following sections: Please comment on and take into account the strengths of the submission. judged by the same quality standards, regardless of whether the authors With these considerations in mind, the Organizing Committee has decided on the following format: For each paper, authors must upload *two* pre-recorded video presentations. The growing volume of digital data stimulates the adoption of recommender systems in different socioeconomic domains, including news industries. ethical considerations. Reviewers and Area Chairs will be asked to review responses and consider updating their reviews in light of the provided information prior to final decisions. Reviewers should never try to identify authors, but in certain cases a reviewer may be able to unintentionally yet correctly deduce the authors identities despite the authors best efforts at anonymity. program and will be evaluated for their contributions following It is clear how this work differs from previous contributions. FAccT welcomes submissions that touch on any of the topics of Models of agent responsiveness, termed "strategic manipulation," analyze the interaction between We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. New York, NY, Feb. 25, 2021 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency (ACM FAccT), to be held virtually from March 3-10, brings together. A long line of work has therefore sought to counteract strategic behavior by designing more We study a two-stage model, in which students are 1) admitted to college on the basis of an entrance exam which is a noisy signal about their qualifications (type), and then 2) those students who were admitted to college can be hired by an employer as a We identify and explore differential access to population-level signaling (also known as information design) as a source of unequal access to opportunity. preliminary title and abstract should be representative of the submitted In Proceed- on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Semantic Evalua- '21, page 610-623, New York, NY, USA. About us. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. ACM We welcome submissions in the following areas: We especially welcome contributions that incorporate perspectives and investigations on FAccT that are relevant to or grounded in the cultures, norms, laws, and/or sociopolitical systems from regions that are usually not featured prominently at FAccT, which has so far been composed mainly of North American and European scholarship. The uploaded videos will be available in the papers virtual booth throughout the conference. guidelines in shaping study design, analysis, and dissemination. chairs will make every effort to ensure that papers are reviewed by If you need to cite existing work to justify one of your comments, please be as precise as possible and give a complete citation. Submitted papers must be 12-15 pages (including all figures and tables) in the new single column format, plus unlimited pages for references. The conference brings together researchers and practitioners interested in fairness, accountability, and transparency in socio-technical systems. In this case, the authors should not cite the report, so as to preserve anonymity. The objectives of the reviewing process are: The first objective ensures that ACM FAT* is considered a top tier venue for the discussion of fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Though familiar at first blush, it lacks a single precise meaning. and abstracts up until the full paper submission deadline, however the Videos will be manually reviewed before being posted to Hopin; videos without adequate captions or that present other serious accessibility concerns will be returned for revision. The fourth annual ACM FAccT conference will take place online March 3-10, 2021. conference, ACM FAccT requires a broad as well as deep set of expertise Although you may have the opportunity to review this rebuttal and revise your recommendation, generally speaking, your overall assessment should reflect on whether you believe the paper merits acceptance except for minor revisions. Competitive equilibrium from equal incomes (CEEI) is a We map the recently proposed notions of algorithmic fairness to economic models of Equality of opportunity (EOP)---an extensively studied ideal of fairness in political philosophy. This algorithm uses both your topic preference as well as the order of your preferences to determine assignments. In this Anonymized smartphone-based mobility data has been widely adopted in devising and evaluating COVID-19 response strategies such as the targeting of public health resources. ACM FAccT maintains confidentiality of submitted material. Upon acceptance, the titles, authorship, and abstracts of We strongly recommend that authors also read it to familiarize themselves with the reviewing process. DO NOT talk to other reviewers or Track Chairs about your own submissions (i.e., submissions you are an author on) or submissions with which you have a conflict. Conspicuously absent from the literature is a rigorous treatment of public trust in AI. Please describe and consider the strengths of the submission. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. disclosure of audits. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. Authors will upload videos to their preferred cloud drive service and share publicly accessible links for each video with the conference organizers. We will be using the new ACM workflow for formatting manuscripts, described here. an ethical concern, and authors agree to be available at any time during The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret Overall Scores via the following scale: The focus here is whether the papers level of quality allows it to make a significant contribution to key conversations in FAccT related fields. Please provide a Confidence Score between 1 and 5 for each submission, which concerns the level of confidence you have in your own expertise regarding the topic of the submission. The ACM Conference for Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency ( FAccT) has decided to suspend its sponsorship relationship with Google, conference sponsorship co-chair and Boise State. : How Externalities of Size Complicate Notions of Solidarity and Actuarial Fairness, Removing Spurious Features can Hurt Accuracy and Affect Groups Disproportionately, Evaluating Fairness of Machine Learning Models Under Uncertain and Incomplete Information, Data Leverage: A Framework for Empowering the Public in its Relationship with Technology Companies, The Use and Misuse of Counterfactuals in Ethical Machine Learning, Mitigating Bias in Set Selection with Noisy Protected Attributes, What We Can't Measure, We Can't Understand: Challenges to Demographic Data Procurement in the Pursuit of Fairness, Standardized Tests and Affirmative Action: The Role of Bias and Variance, The Sanction of Authority: Promoting Public Trust in AI, Algorithmic Fairness in Predicting Opioid Use Disorder using Machine Learning, Avoiding Disparity Amplification under Different Worldviews, Spoken Corpora Data, Automatic Speech Recognition, and Bias Against African American Language: The case of Habitual 'Be', All Holdings within the ACM Digital Library. Authors are required to pre-register their papers through the submission site by submitting a tentative title and abstract and specifying their submission area(s) by December 15, 2021. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency Fairness, Equality, and Power in Algorithmic Decision-Making. We recommend using 16:9 Aspect Ratio, and minimum 1080p resolution. Submissions that do not comply with this policy will be rejected without review. that investigate core assumptions and propose alternative designs, For authors, it provides transparency into our decisions and, as such, guidance for revising their work for rebuttal and for their final presentation. ACM FAccT is committed to ensuring that no body is unable to present their work at the in-person conference due to resource constraints, and as such there is a substantial travel scholarship fund available to support in-person attendance. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. These include: compliance with applicable laws, respect for privacy, secure storage of sensitive data, voluntary and informed consent when appropriate, avoiding deceptive practices when not essential, beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc disclosure of audits.
acm facct acceptance rate
ใส่ความเห็น